Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 23/98-Cus. dated 2-6-1998 was admissible to the imported compressor as a part of Ground Power Unit and, therefore, as a part of aircraft.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the earlier view of the same Bench, on which the departmental challenge was based, had already been carried in appeal and the civil appeal stood dismissed by the Supreme Court. In that circumstance, the objection that a compressor forming part of a Ground Power Unit could not be treated as part of an aeroplane could not be accepted.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 23/98-Cus. was held admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected, and the assessee retained the benefit of customs exemption on the imported compressor.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the higher court has upheld the exemption-linked characterization of components as parts of aircraft, the same classification applies to the imported component for the purpose of the customs exemption notification.