Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether IC engines used in the manufacture of tractors were entitled to exemption under Serial No. 296 of Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. dated 01.03.2002 despite Note 2(e) to Section XVII of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 treating goods of Heading 84.08 as not being parts and accessories of goods of Section XVII.
Analysis: The exemption could not be denied merely because, for classification purposes, the goods were excluded from being treated as parts or accessories by virtue of the section note. A prior Tribunal decision had extended the exemption in an analogous situation where the same reasoning based on Section XVII notes was rejected. The reasoning was reinforced by CBEC Circular No. 512/8/2000-CX dated 10.02.2000, which clarified that goods falling under other chapters would still be covered by the relevant exemption notification if they functioned as parts of specified goods and the other conditions of the notification were satisfied.
Conclusion: The denial of exemption was unsustainable, and the demand and penalty were set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification specifically covers parts of specified goods, exclusion from classification as parts under Section XVII notes does not by itself defeat the exemption if the notification's conditions are otherwise met.