Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the intermediate product arising in the manufacture of jute backed floor coverings was marketable and therefore excisable under CET sub-heading 5603.00.
Analysis: The product was found to be a non-woven jute sheet with some stability imparted by the manufacturing process. Similar products made by the assessee were being cleared and marketed on payment of duty, which established the department's initial burden on marketability. The assessee failed to show any real distinction between the captive intermediate product and the marketable product other than the assertion that it was uncured and lacked elasticity. On the record, no curing process had been shown up to the stage at which duty was demanded, and the contention that the product had no market was not accepted.
Conclusion: The intermediate product was held to be marketable and hence excisable, and it was classifiable under CET sub-heading 5603.00; the contention of the assessee was rejected.