Duty remission under Rule 49 is confined to goods not issued for processing and subject to prescribed conditions.

Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was examined as to whether duty remission could be granted for inputs and finished goods destroyed in a fire. The analysis states that remission is available only within the Commissioner's statutory power and subject to the prescribed conditions, and that it does not extend to inputs already issued for processing. On that reasoning, goods not issued for processing alone were treated as eligible for such relief, and the order dropping the demand was held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether remission of duty could be granted under Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for inputs and finished goods destroyed in a fire, and whether such remission was available without proper application and only in respect of goods not issued for processing.

Analysis: Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 empowered the Commissioner of Central Excise to grant remission subject to the prescribed conditions. The reasoning accepted the Revenue's contention that remission was not available for inputs already issued for processing, and relied on the view that goods not issued for processing alone could qualify for such relief. On that basis, the order dropping the demand was found unsustainable.

Conclusion: Remission of duty was not available on the facts, and the Revenue's challenge succeeded.

Final Conclusion: The order dropping the proceedings was set aside and the demand-related appeal was allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: Remission under Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is available only within the limits of the power vested in the Commissioner and does not extend to inputs already issued for processing.

---