TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Insufficient Evidence on Radiator Serial Numbers</h1> <h3>BANCO PRODUCTS (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., VADODARA</h3> BANCO PRODUCTS (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., VADODARA - 2007 (209) E.L.T. 210 (Tri. - Mumbai) The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai considered whether Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rule 1944 could be availed in the case. The appeal was dismissed as the evidence provided was not sufficient to explain new serial numbers given to Radiators brought back for repairs. The appeal was disposed of and dismissed.
TaxTMI 