Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions for Failing to Exhaust Appeal Remedies The High Court of Karnataka dismissed writ petitions as the appellants failed to utilize the available appeal remedy under section 260A of the Income-tax ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions for Failing to Exhaust Appeal Remedies
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed writ petitions as the appellants failed to utilize the available appeal remedy under section 260A of the Income-tax Act and could not invoke discretionary jurisdiction under articles 226 and 227 to challenge the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's order. Appellants were advised to pursue the appropriate remedy by challenging the Tribunal's orders with an application for condonation of delay if required.
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed writ petitions as the appellants could not invoke discretionary jurisdiction under articles 226 and 227 to cancel the order made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal when an alternate remedy of appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act was available. Appellants were advised to challenge the Tribunal's orders with an application for condonation of delay if pursuing their remedy before the wrong forum. The appeals were dismissed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
