Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a case governed by presumptive taxation under section 44AD, the entire amount of alleged on-money received during survey under section 133A could be added to income merely on the basis of a partner's statement recorded during survey.
Analysis: The assessee's business fell within the presumptive scheme of section 44AD, under which income is deemed at the prescribed percentage of gross receipts and the Assessing Officer cannot, without supporting material, fasten a higher income merely because an admission was made during survey. A statement recorded under section 133A does not carry the evidentiary value of a sworn statement under section 132(4), and an admission made during survey cannot by itself justify an addition in the absence of corroborative material showing that the alleged on-money represented taxable profit in its entirety. As the receipts did not exceed the statutory limit and the income returned was already more than the deemed minimum, no further addition was warranted.
Conclusion: The addition of the entire alleged on-money was not sustainable and was deleted; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In a presumptive taxation case, income cannot be enhanced beyond the statutory presumptive rate solely on the basis of an uncorroborated statement recorded during survey under section 133A.