Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on inputs used in job work where the processed goods were returned without payment of duty, and whether such inputs could be treated as having been used in exempted goods.
Analysis: The appellants had received materials for job work and returned them without payment of duty in accordance with Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001. They also used certain inputs received directly for the same job work and took credit of the duty paid on those inputs. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench decision holding that inputs used in manufacture of final products cleared without payment of duty after job work are not to be regarded as inputs used in exempted goods, and therefore credit cannot be denied on that basis.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to Cenvat credit on the inputs used for the job work activity.
Ratio Decidendi: Inputs used in the manufacture of goods cleared without payment of duty after job work are not treated as inputs used in exempted goods for the purpose of denying Cenvat credit.