Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's earlier order contained a mistake apparent from record warranting rectification in relation to disallowance of provision for orphan claims.
Analysis: The Tribunal had already considered the assessee's reliance on the principles governing allowance of business liabilities and had recorded reasons for holding that the provision for orphan claims was not deductible. The liability was not shown to be certain during the relevant year, and the provision was therefore outside the scope of allowable deduction under sections 30 to 43A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal further held that the adjustment was required under rule 5(a) of Part B of the First Schedule, and that the earlier distinction drawn from the Supreme Court authorities did not disclose any obvious error. A rectification application cannot be used to reargue the merits or seek a review of a speaking order.
Conclusion: No mistake apparent from record was shown, and rectification was not permissible.
Final Conclusion: The challenged order was upheld and the assessee's request for rectification failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Rectification is confined to patent errors and cannot be used to revisit a reasoned determination on the deductibility of a provision where the liability was not certain during the relevant year.