Valid gift of immovable property: contemporaneous agreements cannot defeat an absolute transfer once ownership has vested in the donee.

A valid gift of immovable property transfers ownership immediately where the deed shows delivery of possession, relinquishment of the donor's rights, and no reserved reversion. In that situation, the property vests in the donee and the income from it is not assessable in the donor's hands. A contemporaneous agreement will not be read with the gift deed to convert an otherwise absolute transfer into a conditional one when it deals with separate post-transfer obligations, such as use restrictions or breach charges. The document notes that once the statutory requirements of transfer and acceptance are satisfied, tax consequences follow the vested donee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the income from Shalini Palace could be included in the assessee's total income on the footing that the property had not been validly transferred by gift; (ii) whether the gift deed and the contemporaneous agreement had to be read together so as to treat the transfer as conditional and incomplete.

Issue (i): Whether the income from Shalini Palace could be included in the assessee's total income on the footing that the property had not been validly transferred by gift.

Analysis: The gift deed showed an immediate transfer of ownership and possession to the donee, with the assessee relinquishing all rights in the property. The donee was made liable for taxes and other outgoings, and the document did not reserve any right of reversion in favour of the assessee. On those terms, the statutory requirements for a valid gift of immovable property were satisfied, and the property vested in the donee.

Conclusion: The income from the property could not be assessed in the assessee's hands; this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the gift deed and the contemporaneous agreement had to be read together so as to treat the transfer as conditional and incomplete.

Analysis: The gift deed and the agreement were executed on the same day, but they governed different matters. The deed effected the transfer, while the agreement regulated the subsequent user of the property and provided a separate monetary charge in the event of breach. The existence of such a charge showed that the property had already vested in the donee, and the agreement could not be imported into the gift deed to convert an absolute transfer into a conditional one.

Conclusion: The documents could not be treated as one composite transaction for defeating the gift, and the gift was absolute and irrevocable; this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the Revenue and the assessee was held not liable to be taxed on the property income in question, the gift having been upheld as a valid and unconditional transfer.

Ratio Decidendi: Contemporaneous documents will not be read together to defeat an otherwise complete and unconditional gift of immovable property, and once the statutory requirements of transfer and acceptance are satisfied, title and tax consequences follow the vested donee.

---