Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit was available to buyers of inputs received from manufacturers operating under the compounded levy scheme, and whether the recipients were required to prove that the suppliers had paid the exact duty in the prescribed manner.
Analysis: The respondents received inputs from units working under the compounded levy scheme. The revenue did not dispute that the supplier-manufacturers were operating under that scheme, though it questioned the form of declarations on the invoices and the exact duty particulars. The entitlement to deemed credit under Notification No. 58/97 was treated as available to buyers of such inputs, and it was held that the buyers were not required to lead evidence proving the correct duty payment by the manufacturers when the suppliers' coverage under the compounded levy scheme was not in dispute.
Conclusion: Deemed credit was available to the respondents, and the objection based on the invoice declarations and proof of exact duty payment failed.