Cold rolling and tariff classification: Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

Cold rolling of stainless steel was examined against Note 2 to Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with the key question being whether the process caused hardening of the product. On the material available, no indication was found that the end-product was hardened, and earlier Tribunal rulings were treated as supporting interim relief. On that prima facie basis, the applicants were held to have made out a case for waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Full waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed pending final disposal of the appeals.

---

---

Issues: Whether Note 2 to Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 applied to the cold rolling process undertaken by the assessee, and whether the applicants had made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

Analysis: The order noted that the question whether cold rolling of stainless steel results in hardening of the product is fact-specific. On the material then available, no indication was found that the process undertaken resulted in hardening of the end-product. The order also referred to earlier Tribunal decisions treating the issue as settled in favour of the applicants for the purpose of interim relief. In that view, a prima facie case for waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was made out.

Outcome: Full waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed pending final disposal of the appeals.

---