Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was competent to alter the draft statement of case and add questions in the final statement of case, and whether such alteration amounted to an impermissible review of its earlier decision.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 contemplates the Tribunal drawing up a statement of case for reference to the High Court. The draft statement prepared at an intermediate stage is only tentative, and notice to the parties for suggestions shows that the process remains open until the final statement is settled. The Tribunal may reconsider the questions to be referred while finalising the statement, and such reconsideration is part of the reference procedure rather than a review of a concluded order. The Court held that the draft statement has no finality and that the final statement may lawfully modify it after hearing the parties.
Conclusion: The addition of questions in the final statement of case was valid, and it did not amount to an impermissible review. The issue was decided against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: In reference proceedings under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a draft statement of case is only an intermediate and tentative stage, and the Tribunal may alter the questions to be referred when finalising the statement after hearing the parties, without such alteration constituting review.