Capital goods exemption under Cenvat rules is confined to specified goods, excluding Chapter 76 aluminium jig wires and rods.

Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was described as available only where the goods manufactured and used within the factory qualify as capital goods under Rule 2(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. Aluminium jig wires and rods falling under Chapter 76 were stated not to be specified capital goods within that definition, so the exemption was unavailable despite their use in manufacture of final products. The commentary also notes that arguments based on treatment as inputs or absence of declaration did not affect eligibility for the exemption. On interim relief, no case for full waiver of pre-deposit was made out and partial deposit was directed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Aluminium Jig Wires and Rods manufactured in the factory and used within the factory for manufacture of final products were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. as capital goods under Rule 2(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, and whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was warranted.

Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was available only to capital goods as defined in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, when manufactured in a factory and used within the factory of production. Goods falling under Chapter 76 were not specified within the definition of capital goods under Rule 2(b). Although the Aluminium Jig Wires and Rods were used in the manufacture of final products, they were not cenvatable capital goods within that definition. The argument regarding their possible treatment as inputs or the absence of declaration was held to be irrelevant to the availability of the exemption. On the stay issue, no prima facie case for full waiver was found.

Conclusion: The exemption was not available to the Aluminium Jig Wires and Rods, and full waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit 50% of the duty demand.

Final Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was held unavailable on the stated facts, while interim relief was granted only to the limited extent of partial pre-deposit.

Ratio Decidendi: Exemption confined to capital goods under the relevant Cenvat definition cannot be extended to goods not falling within that definition, even if they are used in the manufacturing process within the factory.

---