Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether equal penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was mandatory on confirmation of the duty demand, and whether the reduced penalty sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals) was liable to be restored.
Analysis: The appeal proceeded on the basis that the duty demand had been confirmed and that there was no material showing payment of duty within the stipulated period. The record also disclosed no established bona fide belief or classification dispute to take the case out of the mandatory penalty regime. In these circumstances, the reasoning applied to support imposition of equal penalty under Section 11AC.
Conclusion: Equal penalty under Section 11AC was held to be exigible, and the penalty was restored to the full amount of the confirmed duty demand, in favour of the Revenue.