1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai: Appeal Partially Allowed, Credit Granted, Disallowance Upheld, Penalty Reduced</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai partially allowed the appeal, granting the appellants credit of Rs. 19,984/- while upholding the disallowance of ... Cenvat/Modvat - Duty paying documents Issues: Disallowance of Modvat credit and penalty impositionAnalysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai arose from the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) disallowing Modvat credit of Rs. 67,713/- to the appellants and imposing a penalty of Rs. 7,000/- on them. The disallowed amount comprised Rs. 19,984/- due to the absence of a required certificate and the remaining amount due to the appellants' inability to avail credit at a rate higher than the actual duty paid by the input supplier.Regarding the disallowed amount of Rs. 19,984/-, it was argued that the relevant invoice contained all the necessary particulars as required by the certificate prescribed under the relevant Notification. The Tribunal agreed with this argument, holding that the appellants were entitled to this credit as the invoice already included the required particulars. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the credit of Rs. 19,984/- to the appellants.On the remaining disallowed amount of Rs. 47,729/-, the Tribunal concurred with the lower appellate authority that the appellants could only claim credit based on the duty actually paid by the input supplier, not at a higher rate of 12%. Consequently, the disallowance of credit amounting to Rs. 47,729/- was upheld by the Tribunal.Additionally, the penalty imposed on the appellants was reduced from Rs. 7,000/- to Rs. 2,500/- by the Tribunal. In conclusion, the appeal was partially allowed by the Tribunal, granting the appellants the credit of Rs. 19,984/- while upholding the disallowance of credit amounting to Rs. 47,729/- and reducing the penalty to Rs. 2,500/-.