TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed Due to Delay in Filing - Importance of Timely Procedures</h1> The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the Order-in-Original due to a significant delay of 160 days in filing the appeal. Despite multiple ... Appeal by Department - Limitation Issues: Delay in filing appeal, Condonation of delay, Procedure for filing application for condonation of delayIn this case, the main issue revolves around the delay in filing an appeal by the Revenue against the Order-in-Original. The appeal was required to be filed within three months but was filed after a delay of 160 days. The department had been given multiple opportunities over the past six years to file an application for condonation of delay. The delay was only noticed after being pointed out by the SDR CESTAT.The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner had not understood the correct procedure for filing an application for condonation of delay. It was emphasized that the delay must be explained by sufficient cause, and merely submitting an application without providing an explanation is insufficient. Despite directions to file a COD application along with an Affidavit, no such action was taken by the department. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the grounds of being time-barred.The judgment highlights the importance of following proper procedures for condonation of delay in filing appeals. It underscores the necessity of providing a sufficient cause for the delay and complying with the directions given by the Tribunal. Failure to adhere to these requirements can result in the dismissal of the appeal on the grounds of being time-barred.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
