Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the period prior to 1-9-1996, the entire quantity of inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods, including processing loss, had to be taken into account while reversing credit under Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The respondents had used common inputs for dutiable and exempted goods and had reversed credit in respect of inputs used for exempted goods. The dispute was confined to whether the quantity attributable to processing loss formed part of the inputs relatable to exempted production. The period involved was prior to the introduction of Rule 57CC, and at that time Rule 57C governed denial of credit on inputs used in exempted goods. The entire quantity of inputs consumed in such manufacture, including processing loss, was required to be considered for determining the credit to be reversed.
Conclusion: The demand was sustainable to the extent of including processing loss in the computation for reversal of credit, and the contrary finding of the lower appellate authority was set aside for the relevant period.