1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Success: Tribunal Allows Revenue's Challenge on Unexplained Cash Credits for 1993-94</h1> The revenue's appeal against the deletion of unexplained cash credits and interest additions for the assessment year 1993-94 was allowed by the Tribunal. ... Cash credits Issues:Appeal against additions of unexplained cash credits and interest deletion.Analysis:1. The appeal pertains to the assessment year 1993-94, challenging the deletion of Rs. 3,80,000 added as unexplained cash credits and Rs. 57,000 as interest by the CIT(A).2. The assessee's income declaration for the year was Rs. 33,100, derived from various sources including share in firms and proprietorship of a business.3. Following a search at the assessee's premises, the Assessing Officer noted discrepancies in the returns of income filed by creditors, leading to the addition of unexplained cash credits and interest.4. The CIT(A) deleted the additions, stating that the assessee had discharged the onus regarding the cash credits.5. During the appeal, the revenue argued that the Assessing Officer's decision was based on the circumstances and financial capacity of the creditors.6. The assessee cited a Tribunal decision related to a similar case, emphasizing that most creditors were taxpayers and the addition could only be sustained for two creditors.7. The Tribunal differentiated the present case from the referenced decision, highlighting the possession of acknowledgment receipts by the assessee and the lack of established financial capacity of the creditors.8. Legal principles regarding the burden of proof on the assessee in cases of cash credits were discussed, citing relevant case laws and emphasizing the need to establish creditor identity, capacity, and credit genuineness.9. Considering the lack of benefit from previous decisions, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the Assessing Officer for reassessment, directing a final opportunity for the assessee to prove the cash credits' legitimacy.10. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, with the previous decisions and orders on the issue being set aside for a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer.This detailed analysis of the judgment outlines the issues, arguments presented, Tribunal's considerations, legal principles applied, and the final decision, providing a comprehensive understanding of the case.