Agricultural land sale receipts treated as capital field where continued cultivation and no trading motive were shown.

Gains from sale of plantation land were treated as capital receipts rather than business income because the land was held and used as agricultural land for years, with continued cultivation and no material showing a trading motive. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's reliance on later inspection findings such as layouts, roads, houses, or electrification, holding that the land's character must be determined on the facts existing at the time of transfer. It also noted that the sales were made to meet financial liabilities, not as an adventure in the nature of trade. The receipts were therefore regarded as falling in the capital field in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the gains arising from sale of plantation land were assessable as business income on the footing of adventure in the nature of trade, or as capital gains on the basis that the land remained agricultural land and was not a capital asset within section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The assessee had purchased and held the lands as agricultural lands for many years and had continued agricultural operations. The Tribunal had already, in the assessee's own case for an earlier assessment year, held on similar facts that there was no adventure in the nature of trade and that the sale proceeds fell in the capital field. The Revenue's reliance on a later inspection and on the existence of layouts, roads, houses, or electrification was not accepted, since the relevant character of the land had to be judged with reference to the facts existing at the time of transfer, and later developments could not displace the established agricultural character. The Tribunal also noted that the sales were made to meet financial liabilities and not with a business motive of trading in land.

Conclusion: The gains were not assessable as business income; the land was treated as agricultural land and the receipts were held to be in the capital field, in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Where agricultural land is held and sold as such, with continued agricultural use and no material to show a trading motive, the mere cutting up of land or later developments around it do not establish adventure in the nature of trade, and the character of the asset must be determined on the facts existing at the time of transfer.

---