Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Department could recover an erroneous refund by invoking Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and whether the doctrine of unjust enrichment could be applied in such proceedings.
Analysis: The refund had already been sanctioned and paid on the basis of a final appellate order. Recovery was initiated under Section 11A(1) as a proceeding for erroneous refund. In such proceedings, the principle of unjust enrichment embodied in Section 11B was held inapplicable, and the recovery order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The recovery could not be upheld and the assessee succeeded on the issue.