2002 (11) TMI 54 - HC - Income Tax

High Court rules share income from family trust not included for tax rate purposes

Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus PN. Bajaj.

The High Court of MADRAS ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the inclusion of the assessee's share of income from a private family trust ... '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee's share of income of the private family trust cannot be taken into account for rate purposes under section 86(v) of the Income-tax Act?' - we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal holding that the share of the benefit received by the assessee from the trust is not liable to be taken into account for rate purposes. - The question of law referred to us is answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Issues:Interpretation of section 86(v) of the Income-tax Act regarding inclusion of the assessee's share of income from a private family trust for rate purposes in individual assessment.Analysis:The High Court of MADRAS examined the case where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred a question of law related to the assessment of an individual for the year 1985-86. The issue was whether the assessee's share of income from a private family trust should be considered for rate purposes under section 86(v) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee, a beneficiary of the trust, received a sum of Rs. 30,013, which was included by the Assessing Officer for rate purposes under section 86. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, but the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the share income cannot be included for rate purposes as the assessee did not receive it as a member of an association of persons.The Court clarified that the inclusion of the share income for rate purposes depends on whether the assessee was a member of an association of persons during the assessment year. Section 86 of the Income-tax Act deals with the procedure for assessing the share of a member of an association of persons in the income of the association. In this case, since the representative assessee was not assessed as an association of persons, the share income received by the beneficiary cannot be considered for rate purposes under section 86(v).Furthermore, the Court highlighted that even if the association of persons was taxed at the maximum marginal rate, the share income of the member would not be included in their total income for rate purposes. As the entire income of the trust was taxed at the maximum marginal rate, section 86(v) was deemed inapplicable. Therefore, the Court concluded that the benefit received by the assessee from the trust should not be included for rate purposes under section 86 of the Act.Additionally, the Court addressed the argument regarding section 5 of the Act, stating that section 86(v) specifically excludes the inclusion of share income for rate purposes, regardless of other provisions of the Act. Considering these aspects, the Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the share of the benefit received from the trust should not be taken into account for rate purposes.In conclusion, the Court answered the question of law in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, with no order as to costs in the given circumstances.