Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the 2% quantity of shampoo lost as waste during repacking at the job worker's premises.
Analysis: The disputed shortage arose during repacking undertaken by job workers, and the wastage occurred in the course of, and in relation to, manufacture of the final retail-pack product. Rule 57D(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 permitted credit in respect of such input waste at the material time. The cited Tribunal decisions supported the same legal position, though the departmental circular did not alter that entitlement.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the 2% input waste, and the demand raised under Rule 57-I was not sustainable.