Appeal Outcome: Unaccounted Receipts Deleted, Bribe Payments Reversed, Interest Rate Reinstated at 2.

The appeals were partly allowed. The Tribunal confirmed CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition for unaccounted receipts and upheld the exclusion of regular income for AY 1999-2000 from undisclosed income. It reversed the allowance of bribe payments, restored the AO's disallowance, upheld the restriction on surcharge levy to AY 2000-01, and reinstated the AO's interest rate of 2% under section 158BFA.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Unaccounted Receipts from Incomplete Projects
2. Bribe Payments
3. Inclusion of Regular Income for Assessment Year 1999-2000 in Undisclosed Income
4. Levy of Surcharge
5. Interest Rate under Section 158BFA

Detailed Analysis:

1. Unaccounted Receipts from Incomplete Projects:
The revenue contested the relief of Rs. 38,12,790 given by CIT(A) for unaccounted receipts from three incomplete projects. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined undisclosed income from seized documents and apportioned it equally among the four assessees. The AO treated the unaccounted receipts as cash credits under section 68 of the IT Act, as the assessees failed to provide customer-wise details. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, arguing that the unaccounted receipts had already been considered for explaining unaccounted expenses. The Tribunal held that section 68 is not applicable to entries in documents, and since the amount was used to explain unaccounted expenses, the CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition was confirmed.

2. Bribe Payments:
The AO disallowed Rs. 1,38,500 for bribe payments under Explanation to section 37(1). The CIT(A) allowed the expense, stating that restrictive provisions should not apply to undisclosed income. The Tribunal disagreed, holding that section 158BB requires applying provisions of the Act, including Explanation to section 37(1). The CIT(A)'s allowance of bribe payments was reversed, and the AO's disallowance was restored.

3. Inclusion of Regular Income for Assessment Year 1999-2000 in Undisclosed Income:
The AO included regular income for AY 1999-2000 in undisclosed income since the return was filed after the search. The CIT(A) directed the AO to exclude regular income from undisclosed income, as the income was reflected in regular books and advance tax was paid. The Tribunal confirmed CIT(A)'s order, noting that the income was not discovered during the search and was disclosed by filing the return under section 139(4).

4. Levy of Surcharge:
The CIT(A) restricted the levy of surcharge to AY 2000-01, as surcharge was not applicable to earlier years. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s order, noting that surcharge is not leviable for searches conducted before 1-6-2002.

5. Interest Rate under Section 158BFA:
The CIT(A) directed the AO to charge interest at 1.25% instead of 2%, as the assessment was completed after the rate reduction effective from 1-6-2001. The Tribunal reversed CIT(A)'s order, holding that interest should be levied at the rate prevailing during the period of default, restoring the AO's decision to charge 2%.

Conclusion:
The appeals were partly allowed, confirming CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition for unaccounted receipts, reversing the allowance of bribe payments, confirming the exclusion of regular income for AY 1999-2000 from undisclosed income, upholding the restriction on surcharge levy, and restoring the AO's interest rate under section 158BFA.

---