Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether agricultural land situated within the jurisdiction of a municipal corporation, though the village had a population of less than 10,000 and the land was used for agricultural purposes, fell outside the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 2(14)(iii) excludes agricultural land from the definition of capital asset only where the land is not situate in an area comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality, municipal corporation or similar local authority having a population of not less than 10,000. The decisive factor is the jurisdictional location of the land within the municipal area, not the population of the particular village or locality within that municipal area. The cited Supreme Court and High Court authorities were applied to hold that once the land falls within the municipal corporation limits, the exemption is not available merely because the village itself has a population below the statutory threshold.
Conclusion: The land was a capital asset within the meaning of section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the capital gain on its sale was taxable. The decision was in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the relevant test is whether the land is situated within the jurisdiction of a municipality or municipal corporation; the population of the individual village or locality within that jurisdiction does not determine exemption.