2005 (11) TMI 376 - AT - Income Tax

Retailer penalized for tax non-compliance

The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271A of the Income-tax Act against the appellant, a retailer in kiryana goods. The penalty was ... Penalty - For failure to keep, maintain or retain books of account, etc. Issues:1. Penalty imposed under section 271A of the Income-tax Act.2. Application of provisions of section 44AF and section 44AA.3. Maintaining books of account and turnover declaration.Analysis:Issue 1: Penalty under section 271AThe appellant, a retailer in kiryana goods, challenged the penalty imposed under section 271A by the Assessing Officer. The appellant contended that being covered under section 44AF, they should not be penalized. However, it was argued that the penalty was imposed before the final assessment order under section 143(3) was issued, potentially violating section 44AA. The authorities maintained that the appellant failed to declare the total turnover, leading to the penalty. The Tribunal upheld the penalty, noting the absence of a bona fide mistake and lack of reasonable cause for not maintaining books of account.Issue 2: Provisions of section 44AF and section 44AAThe appellant claimed to fall under section 44AF due to being engaged in retail trade. However, the appellant's failure to declare total turnover and profit figures raised doubts. The Tribunal observed that the appellant did not maintain books of account and failed to provide a valid reason for this lapse. As the income exceeded the threshold set by section 44AA, the penalty under section 271A was deemed appropriate, as the appellant did not meet the conditions specified in section 44AF.Issue 3: Maintaining books of account and turnover declarationThe appellant's argument that they were not educated enough to maintain accounts was countered by the presence of a qualified Chartered Accountant and an advocate assisting them. The appellant's claim of turnover figures was considered an afterthought by the authorities, as it was not mentioned in previous filings. The Tribunal highlighted that without proper turnover declaration, the appellant could not benefit from the provisions of section 44AF. The failure to maintain books of account and the absence of a valid reason for this omission led to upholding the penalty under section 271A.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the penalty imposed under section 271A due to the appellant's non-compliance with the provisions of section 44AA and failure to maintain proper accounts and declare total turnover.