Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether raincoats made out of rubberised textile fabrics were prima facie classifiable under Heading 6201.00 rather than Heading 4015.00, and whether the appellants had made out a case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The expression "worn apparel" was held to mean used second-hand garments and not fresh unused garments. On that construction, a fresh raincoat, even if made from rubberised textile fabrics, would remain classifiable under Chapter 62 and not under Chapter 61 or as an accessory under Heading 4015.00. The order also noted that the competing heading was not apt for an entire raincoat and that the earlier relied-upon decision did not consider the HSN notes governing raincoats under Chapter 62. On the materials before the Tribunal, the appellants were found to have a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: The raincoats were prima facie held classifiable under Heading 6201.00, and complete waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, "worn apparel" refers to used garments, while fresh raincoats made from rubberised textile fabrics remain classifiable under Chapter 62 and are not covered by Heading 4015.00 as an accessory.