Customs valuation excludes post-importation engineering and supervision charges unless buyer-supplied design inputs are shown.

Basic design and engineering fees, as-built drawing charges, and foreign supervision charges connected with plant modernisation were held not includible in the assessable value of imported equipment under the Customs Valuation Rules and Section 14 of the Customs Act. The valuation scheme permits addition only where engineering, design, plans or sketches are supplied free of charge or at reduced cost by the buyer to the foreign seller for production of the imported goods; it does not extend to post-importation services such as erection, construction, assembly, maintenance or technical assistance. On those facts, the additions made by the lower authorities were unsustainable and the valuation was treated as erroneous.

---

---

Issues: Whether basic design and engineering fees, as-built drawing charges, and foreign supervision charges were includible in the assessable value of imported equipment under the Customs Valuation Rules and Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Analysis: The charges in dispute related to design, drawings, engineering assistance and supervision connected with modernization and implementation of the plant, and not to any free supply of drawings or engineering by the importer to the foreign supplier. The governing valuation provisions permit inclusion only of the value of engineering, design, plans and sketches supplied free of charge or at reduced cost by the buyer to the supplier, where such items are necessary for production of the imported goods. They do not authorise inclusion of costs relating to post-importation services such as construction, erection, assembly, maintenance or technical assistance. The cited precedents concerning valuation of designs and drawings, or process licence and technology transfer, were held inapplicable to the valuation of imported equipment in the present facts.

Conclusion: The disputed design, drawing and supervision charges were not includible in the assessable value of the imported equipment, and the additions made by the lower authorities were unsustainable.

Issues: Whether the valuation adopted by the lower authorities under Rule 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules read with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 was legally justified.

Analysis: The Court held that neither Section 14 nor the Valuation Rules contained any basis for loading the price of imported equipment with costs of drawings and technical documents required for procurement, manufacture, erection or maintenance in India. The interpretative notes to Rule 4 specifically negatived inclusion of post-importation charges. Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) was also inapplicable because there was no evidence that the importer had supplied engineering or drawings to the foreign seller free of charge or at reduced cost. The valuation adopted below was therefore contrary to the statutory scheme.

Conclusion: The valuation made by the lower authorities was set aside as erroneous and ultra vires.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the impugned additions to customs value were deleted.

Ratio Decidendi: For customs valuation, only those engineering or design elements that are statutorily attributable to the imported goods, or supplied by the buyer free or at reduced cost for production of those goods, may be added to assessable value; post-importation supervision, erection, construction and similar technical services are not includible.

---