Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant's liquefied petroleum gas mixture was classifiable under heading 2711.12 as liquefied propylene gas or under heading 2711.19 as other liquefied petroleum gases, and whether the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 3/2001 was admissible.
Analysis: The competing tariff entries distinguished between specified liquefied gases such as ethylene, propylene, butylenes and butadiene, and the residual category of other liquefied petroleum gases. The product cleared by the appellant was a mixture of gases, and the records showed that its propylene content varied from day to day rather than constituting a pure or commercially distinct propylene product. The fact that the buyer separated propylene from the mixture did not mean that the mixture itself was propylene gas for classification purposes. Classification had to follow the commercial and tariff identity of the goods as removed, not the constituent later extracted by the purchaser.
Conclusion: The product was classifiable under heading 2711.19 and not under heading 2711.12. The appellant was entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 3/2001.