TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Rules Rs. 1,71,35,268 Must Be Included in Business Profit u/s 80HHC; Appeal Favors Assessee.</h1> <h3>EXTRUSION PROCESS PVT. LTD. Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 9 (1) (4)</h3> EXTRUSION PROCESS PVT. LTD. Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 9 (1) (4) - [2007] 106 ITD 336 (MUM.) , [2008] 303 ITR (A. T.) 267 Issues:Validity of reopening assessment under section 147Computation of business profit for section 80HHCAnalysis:The appeal involved a dispute regarding the reopening of assessment under section 147 and the computation of business profit for section 80HHC. The assessee, engaged in the business of manufacturing and exporting aluminum products, faced a challenge with the Central Excise department regarding excise duty payments. After a Supreme Court decision in favor of the assessee, a sum of Rs. 1,71,35,268 was offered for income-tax assessment under section 41(1) for the assessment year 1996-97. The Assessing Officer, however, excluded this amount from business profits for section 80HHC computation, leading to an income escaping assessment. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, prompting the appeal.The first issue raised was the validity of the assessment reopening under section 147. The assessee, however, did not press this ground during the appeal. The second issue concerned the computation of business profit for section 80HHC. The assessee argued that the sum of Rs. 1,71,35,268, brought in by section 41(1), should be considered part of business profit as it was related to the earlier disputed liabilities. The revenue contended that such amounts should be excluded as they were not generated from regular business activities.Upon detailed consideration, the tribunal found that section 41(1) did not create income independently but required writing back of previously claimed deductions. The tribunal emphasized that such deemed income under section 41(1) was integral to the overall business profit computation under sections 28 to 43C. The tribunal also noted that the exclusion provision in section 80HHC did not apply to the sum brought in by section 41(1) as it was not similar to specified receipts. Therefore, the tribunal concluded that the amount of Rs. 1,71,35,268 should be included in the computation of business profit for section 80HHC. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
TaxTMI 