Pre-deposit waiver and provisional redemption: personal penalty cannot be demanded as a condition for release of confiscated goods.

Where confiscated goods were already secured in departmental custody, further pre-deposit and recovery of duty and penalty were waived pending appeal because no additional safeguard was needed for the Revenue. For provisional redemption, only duty and fine could be insisted upon, since personal penalty on the importer was not directly relatable to the goods and could not be made a condition for release. Interim relief was therefore granted, and redemption of the goods was permitted on payment of duty and fine alone while the merits of the appeal remained open.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether pre-deposit and recovery of duty and penalty should be waived pending appeal in view of the custody of the goods and the pending valuation dispute; (ii) whether, for provisional redemption of confiscated goods, the department can insist on deposit of the personal penalty imposed on the importer.

Issue (i): whether pre-deposit and recovery of duty and penalty should be waived pending appeal in view of the custody of the goods and the pending valuation dispute.

Analysis: The goods were already under the department's custody and had been valued at over Rs. 21 lakhs. In these circumstances, no further safeguard was considered necessary at that stage for the Revenue. The dispute regarding valuation, along with the quantum of fine and penalty, was left for examination in due course.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty and penalty amounts was granted.

Issue (ii): whether, for provisional redemption of confiscated goods, the department can insist on deposit of the personal penalty imposed on the importer.

Analysis: The fine and penalty may be insisted upon at the stage of provisional redemption, but personal penalty imposed on the importer is not directly relatable to the goods as such. Only duty and fine are directly connected with the goods, and it would not be proper to insist on deposit of the personal penalty as a condition for redeeming the goods provisionally pending appeal.

Conclusion: The department cannot insist on payment of the personal penalty for provisional redemption; only duty and fine may be required.

Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted to the appellant, and provisional redemption of the goods was permitted on payment of duty and fine alone, while the appeal remained pending on the merits.

Ratio Decidendi: Where confiscated goods are already secured in departmental custody, pre-deposit may be waived if no additional safeguard is necessary, and personal penalty cannot be treated as a condition for provisional redemption because it is not directly relatable to the goods.

---