Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a matter involving both customs duty and anti-dumping duty, the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and interim stay of the penalty imposed, and if so on what terms.
Analysis: The order noted that the import was made before 2004, when the amended provision in Section 9A(8) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 brought offences and penalties into the anti-dumping duty framework by reference to the Customs Act, 1962. It was further observed that the impugned order involved not only anti-dumping duty but also recoverable customs duty, so the objection based on the pre-2004 position could at best apply to the anti-dumping duty component and not to the customs duty component. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found it to grant interim protection, but only on payment of a specified amount within the time allowed.
Conclusion: The appellant was granted conditional interim stay and waiver of the balance pre-deposit on depositing Rs. 50,000 within six weeks, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed.