Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income-tax authority lacked jurisdiction to issue the notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the notice was unsustainable for want of material or sufficient basis.
Analysis: The notice specifically stated that the case had been taken up for scrutiny to verify the correctness of deductions claimed under Chapter VI-A, including deductions relatable to section 80G, section 80HHC and section 80-IB. On the face of the notice, the basis for scrutiny was sufficiently indicated. The Court found no lack of jurisdiction in the Income-tax Officer to issue the notice and no ground to interfere in writ jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The challenge to the scrutiny notice failed. The notice under section 143(2) was upheld and the writ petition was dismissed.