1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court rules funds not used for charity, trustees' conflict of interest breaches tax laws.</h1> The High Court of Madras ruled against the assessee in a case involving the utilization of funds for charitable purposes. The court found that the money ... '(1) Whether, Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amount of Rs. 53,950 was utilised for charitable purposes when there is no application for accumulation of income or option exercised by the assessee? - (2) Whether, Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amount utilised for construction of hospital building after the close of the accounting year can be treated as application of income in the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1987-88? - (3) Whether, Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amount lying as advance with a sister concern of the assessee can be treated as not violating the provisions of section 13(1)(d) read with section 11(5) of the Act?' - The questions referred to us are answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The High Court of Madras ruled against the assessee in a case involving the utilization of funds for charitable purposes. The court found that the money advanced to a sister concern, which remained unused, could not be considered as applied for charitable purposes. The trustees being directors of the sister company led to a violation of relevant tax provisions. The judgment favored the Revenue over the assessee.