Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a 100% export oriented unit clearing part of its goods in the domestic tariff area was liable to pay additional excise duty in view of Notification No. 8/97-C.E., Notification No. 55/91-C.E. and the amending Notification No. 11/2000-C.E.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the binding apex court ruling on the effect of the amending notification inserting the words "or under any other law for the time being in force" into Notification No. 8/97-C.E. It was held that, after the amendment, additional excise duty was not leviable on DTA clearances by an EOU. The Tribunal also noted that the goods stood exempted under Notification No. 55/91-C.E. from payment of additional excise duty under the Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles & Textile Articles) Act, 1978.
Conclusion: The demand of additional excise duty was unsustainable and the assessee succeeded on the issue.