TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether credit was admissible on cable test meter and testing equipment used for measuring and verifying electrical parameters of the manufactured cables; (ii) whether the demand was barred by limitation in the absence of suppression of facts.
Issue (i): whether credit was admissible on cable test meter and testing equipment used for measuring and verifying electrical parameters of the manufactured cables.
Analysis: The eligibility of Modvat credit turns on whether the goods are used for producing or processing the final product or for bringing about a change in the substance used in manufacture. The reasoning accepted that testing equipment used to ensure that the cables met required parameters formed part of the manufacturing process. It was also noted that prior Tribunal decisions had allowed credit on similar measuring and testing instruments.
Conclusion: Credit on the testing equipment was admissible, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether the demand was barred by limitation in the absence of suppression of facts.
Analysis: The declarations filed with the department had disclosed the use of each item, and the department did not show that the declared use differed from the actual use. On that footing, no suppression of facts could be alleged and the extended period was unavailable.
Conclusion: The demand was time-barred, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The order denying credit and confirming duty was set aside, and the appeal succeeded on both merits and limitation.
Ratio Decidendi: Testing and measuring equipment integral to verifying manufacture and compliance with product parameters can qualify for Modvat credit, and full disclosure in declarations defeats a charge of suppression for limitation purposes.
TaxTMI 
