Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income derived from growing and supplying specialized grass on agricultural land constituted agricultural income within the meaning of section 2(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The statutory definition of agricultural income covers income derived from land by agriculture and by processes ordinarily employed to render produce fit for market. Applying the test of agriculture laid down by the Supreme Court, the relevant enquiry is whether basic operations such as tilling, sowing, planting and allied cultivation activities were carried out on the land, followed by subsequent operations necessary for growth and preservation of the crop. On the facts, the land was subjected to cultivation activities including irrigation, soil preparation, planting, weeding, levelling and repeated growth cycles of the specialized grass. The fact that the grass was a specialized crop, that the land was earlier associated with another project, or that the assessee had initially described the receipts differently did not detract from the agricultural character of the operations. The existence of grass on the land at the time of takeover did not establish absence of agricultural operations.
Conclusion: The receipts from the growth and sale of specialized grass were agricultural income and were not taxable as business or other income.