Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether computer workstations and related furniture procured by a 100% export-oriented unit under CT-3 certificate were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. as capital goods or office furniture.
Analysis: The goods were procured under CT-3 certificate issued by the departmental officers and the Director of STPI certified that they were necessary for software development and covered by Notification No. 1/95. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions holding that specially designed chairs, furniture and modular furniture obtained by software units under proper CT-3 certificates were eligible for exemption as office equipment. The later insertion of computer furniture or computer workstation in Notification No. 40/2000-C.E. did not defeat the claim, since the goods were already covered by the wider exemption available under Notification No. 1/95 for capital goods and office furniture.
Conclusion: The impugned goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. and the denial of benefit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods procured by a 100% export-oriented software unit under valid CT-3 certification and certified as necessary for software development may qualify for exemption under the existing notification as capital goods or office furniture, even if a later notification specifically mentions such goods.