Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the professional and legal services rendered by a non-resident firm of solicitors from outside India were taxable in India as fees for included services under article 12 of the India-USA treaty, or were excluded as professional services falling under article 15.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the assessee was a firm of solicitors resident in the United States, had no fixed base in India, and its partners and employees rendered services from outside India. It applied section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and held that the treaty provisions would prevail to the extent they were more beneficial. On the construction of article 12, fees for included services do not cover amounts paid to an individual or firm of individuals for professional services as defined in article 15. The Tribunal also relied on the treaty scheme, which specifically treats legal services rendered by a firm of solicitors as professional services and makes article 12 and article 15 mutually exclusive in such cases. The Revenue authorities' reliance on domestic law decisions was held to be unhelpful because the dispute had to be resolved on the treaty language.
Conclusion: The services fell under article 15 and not article 12, and the amounts received were not taxable in India as fees for included services.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a non-resident firm of solicitors renders professional legal services, and the treaty specifically excludes such payments from the definition of fees for included services, the payment is governed by the independent personal services article rather than the fees-for-services article, with the DTAA prevailing over the Income-tax Act under section 90(2).