TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case on limitation to justify waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery; (ii) whether, on merits, the process of guniting on duty-paid steel pipes amounted to manufacture so as to sustain the demand at the stay stage.
Issue (i): whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case on limitation to justify waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The earlier proceedings having been dropped, the demand based on invocation of the extended period was viewed as prima facie unsustainable. On that basis, the appellants were found to have a strong case on time bar.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the appellants.
Issue (ii): whether, on merits, the process of guniting on duty-paid steel pipes amounted to manufacture so as to sustain the demand at the stay stage.
Analysis: The process was treated, prima facie, as not amounting to manufacture, since the appellants were not manufacturing the steel pipes themselves and the Board's circular supported their stand. The precedent relied upon by the Revenue was held to be distinguishable at this stage.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the appellants.
Final Conclusion: The appellants were held entitled to complete interim protection, and the matter was directed to be heard on priority.
Ratio Decidendi: A strong prima facie case on limitation and merits can justify full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a customs or excise appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
