Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal could direct production of the assessment record and permit inspection of documents to decide the challenge to reassessment proceedings; and whether the requested record and documents were relevant for adjudicating the jurisdictional objection.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that, for discharging its functions, it has wide powers under section 255(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and that Rule 29 of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963 enables it to require production of documents or other material if necessary for passing orders or for any other substantial cause. It found that the intimation relating to processing of the return, the original note that triggered reassessment, and the order sheet of the reassessment proceedings were relevant to decide whether the reassessment was validly initiated and whether the Assessing Officer had applied his mind.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was empowered to call for the relevant records and to permit inspection by the assessee or his advocate.