Customs exemption for research imports upheld; no suppression found, so extended limitation, confiscation, and penalty failed.

Imported goods for research use by a recognised research institute were held to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 70/81-Cus., as the record and supporting certificates confirmed that this was the relevant exemption claimed. The assessee had not claimed Notification No. 64/88-Cus., and there was no misdeclaration or suppression of facts. On that basis, the extended limitation period could not be invoked, because the lapse, if any, was only technical and did not show collusion, wilful suppression, or non-levy attributable to the assessee. Confiscation and penalty were therefore not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 70/81-Cus., and whether the extended period could be invoked or confiscation and penalty sustained on the allegation of misdeclaration or suppression of facts.

Analysis: The imported goods were shown to be for research use by a recognised research institute, and the record supported the claim for exemption under Notification No. 70/81-Cus. The assessee had not sought the benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus., and the documents filed, including the DGHS certificate, supported the claim that the relevant exemption was only under Notification No. 70/81-Cus. In the absence of misdeclaration or suppression of facts, the departmental delay could not justify invocation of the extended period. The lapse, if any, was only technical and did not establish collusion, wilful suppression, or non-levy attributable to the assessee.

Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 70/81-Cus. was upheld, the extended period was not invocable, and confiscation or penal action was not sustainable.

---