Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Sodium Hypochlorite solution was eligible for exemption as "Bleach liquor" under Sl. No. 26 of the Table annexed to Notification No. 7/94-C.E. dated 1-3-94.
Analysis: The notification contained a separate entry for Sodium Hypochlorite at Sl. No. 2 and attached a captive-consumption condition to that entry, while "Bleach liquor" appeared later at Sl. No. 26 without such condition. The separate enumeration of Sodium Hypochlorite showed that the later entry for "Bleach liquor" was residual and was not intended to include Sodium Hypochlorite solution. The comparison with Notification No. 195/86-C.E. was held to be unhelpful because that notification did not contain a separate entry for Sodium Hypochlorite. The Tribunal also relied on the chemist's opinion and Board circular to support the view that "Bleach liquor" did not cover Sodium Hypochlorite solution under the notification in question.
Conclusion: Sodium Hypochlorite solution was not covered by "Bleach liquor" under Sl. No. 26 of Notification No. 7/94-C.E. and was not eligible for exemption on that basis.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing exemption notification separately lists a commodity under one entry, a later residual entry for a different description cannot be construed to include that commodity, especially when the specific entry carries its own conditions for exemption.