Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax reimbursement received under a State incentive scheme for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe entrepreneurs was a capital receipt or a revenue receipt liable to tax.
Analysis: The character of a subsidy depends on its purpose and not on the source from which it is paid. Where the scheme is framed to encourage setting up of industries and the incentive is granted as part of a special package for establishing the business, the receipt is attributable to a capital purpose. The fact that reimbursement is quantified with reference to sales tax, or that it is linked to production, does not by itself make the receipt revenue in nature if the dominant object of the scheme is to assist in setting up the industrial unit.
Conclusion: The sales tax reimbursement under the scheme was held to be a capital subsidy and was not taxable as revenue income, in favour of the assessee.