Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was exigible for failure to get accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or whether the assessee had reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee was in the first year of business and the turnover was only slightly above the audit threshold. The failure to obtain audit was attributed to ignorance of the statutory requirement. In these circumstances, the default was held to be bona fide and not actuated by mala fide intent. The statutory protection under section 273B was held to apply, since the lapse constituted reasonable cause.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and was cancelled.