Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on plastic crates used for carrying P.P. caps under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, or whether the crates were excluded as packing materials/containers under Rule 57B.
Analysis: The credit claim was examined in the context of the definitions and eligibility scheme under the Modvat provisions. Rule 57A governed inputs used in relation to manufacture, while Rule 57B separately dealt with specified classes of inputs used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture of finished goods. The relevant exclusion applied to packing materials or containers where their cost was not included in the assessable value of the final products. The plastic crates were found to be used only for carrying finished or semi-finished P.P. caps from one place to another, and there was no indication that their value formed part of the assessable value of the final goods.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the plastic crates was not admissible, and the appeal was rejected.