Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the conflicting views on eligibility to deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. warranted reference of the matter for constitution of a Larger Bench.
Analysis: The notification was considered to contain both an enabling provision and a restrictive condition requiring direct receipt of inputs under invoice declaring payment of excise duty. Earlier decisions had taken divergent views on whether credit could be denied where the invoice stated that duty was to be discharged under Rule 96-ZP(3), or where departmental reports suggested non-discharge of duty. In view of the apparent conflict in tribunal decisions, finality on the issue required consideration by a Larger Bench.
Conclusion: The matter was directed to be placed before the Hon'ble President for constitution of a Larger Bench.
Final Conclusion: No substantive determination on eligibility to deemed Modvat credit was made in this order, and the issue was referred for authoritative resolution.