Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the recovery of CENVAT credit on the alleged shortage of capital goods was sustainable without verification of the assessee's explanation that the moulds had been repeatedly used, converted into scrap, accounted for in the statutory records, and removed on payment of duty.
Analysis: The disputed shortage concerned C.I. moulds used as capital goods in the manufacture of MS ingots. The explanation was that the moulds had deteriorated into scrap through repeated use and were reflected in the statutory accounts, with duty stated to have been paid on the scrap when cleared. The explanation could not be rejected summarily, particularly when the record did not show verification of the alleged removal or any conclusive finding displacing the assessee's plea. In such a situation, a specific factual determination was necessary before deciding the credit dispute, and the matter had to be examined afresh in accordance with natural justice.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the lower authority for fresh adjudication after verification of the assessee's plea and observance of natural justice.