Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit should be dispensed with in an appeal involving denial of Cenvat credit and duty demand arising from destruction of goods by fire.
Analysis: The dispute concerned demand of Cenvat credit reversal on raw materials and duty on finished goods destroyed in fire. The appellant relied on prior Tribunal decisions dealing with remission where fire occurred due to an accident beyond the assessee's control. The respondent objected that the rejection of the remission claim had not been separately appealed and had attained finality. On a prima facie view, the Tribunal found force in the respondent's objection, but treated the matter as raising a legal issue and considered it fit for hearing without insisting on pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit was dispensed with and the matter was listed for regular hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: In an appeal raising a substantial legal issue, pre-deposit may be waived and the matter taken up for final hearing without entering upon the merits.