Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 despite investments made contrary to section 11(5) in view of proviso (iia) to section 13(1)(d); and whether the question relating to deduction under section 80L survived for consideration.
Analysis: Section 13(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act was retrospectively amended by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with effect from 1 April 1983, and proviso (iia) extended the time available to charitable trusts for disinvestment up to 31 March 1993. On that footing, investments held contrary to section 11(5) during the relevant period did not deprive the assessee of the benefit of section 11. Since the assessee was held entitled to full exemption under section 11, the direction for re-examination by the Assessing Officer ceased to have any survival.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 notwithstanding the impugned investments, and the related issue concerning section 80L did not survive.